A Real Eye-Opener: Bullying with Pellet Guns

When you let your kids go outside to play on a pleasant spring afternoon, you never imagine that you’ll be wrapping up the day’s events with a phone call to the local police department.  Unfortunately for us though, that’s how yesterday unfolded.

It was the perfect kind of day for outdoor fun.  The big kids came home from school, they finished their homework, they did a couple chores, and they went outside to play in the neighbor’s field.  See, there are hay bales in the field, and for some odd reason, all the kids like to jump on the hay bales and roll around in the grass.  I don’t get it, but so long as nobody’s getting into trouble, I don’t mind, and the owner of the field doesn’t mind either.

The kids had been out playing for a while by the time Fred came home from work.  Fred and I talked about our day, I got him some supper, and we spent a little time talking about future plans for projects at the homestead.  It was pretty mundane stuff, actually, right up to the point where are kids came running in shouting that they (and our chickens and cat) were being shot at with Airsoft guns!

Fred jumped up to catch the culprits while I tried to get a little more of the story, but of course the little darlings had gone running when my kids said they were getting us.  Our kids knew one of the boys who was involved, but there was at least one teenager who also had a pellet gun, and my kids had no idea who he was.

If I’d known the parents, or if the kids hadn’t run off, Fred and I may have done something different.  In the end though, we just called the local police department.  That’s not my first choice when it comes to handling something like that, but I think it was the right choice last night.

Apparently, things went something like this.  My boys (7 and 5) wanted to play in the field with the other kids.  The other kids didn’t want my boys to play with them though, so they started picking on Freddie.  (Freddie just wants to be everybody’s friend, and his autism makes it harder for him to pick up on cues from the other kids.  Also, the other kids pick up on the fact that he’s a little “different”, so of course that leaves him wide open for teasing.)

Apparently, Freddie’s classmate was making up stories, saying that he wasn’t the little boy Freddie thought he was.  He went on to say that he was actually “Max” from Africa, and “Africa” was on the other side of our creek.  At some point after this teasing, my dear friend left my house to go home, and she stopped to talk to the kids in the field.  Freddie told her how he just wanted to play but the other kids were being mean to him, and my friend did just what I would have done.  She talked with Freddie and explained that people won’t always want to play with him and that’s OK.  Then she headed home.

That wasn’t the end of it for the kids though.  I don’t know when the Airsoft guns came onto the scene, but apparently the kids threatened my boys saying, “If you come onto this field, we’ll shoot you.” Now, the property owner doesn’t mind if kids play in his field, so my kids felt they had just as much of a right to be in the field as the other boys.  They wanted to play separate from the “bullies”, so when they headed onto the neighbor’s property, the bullies started shooting at my kids! They shot Freddie in the leg, they shot Kevin in the leg and the head, they shot at my chickens, and they shot at my cat threatening, “We’re gonna shoot him in the eye!”

Now, I totally get that kids will be kids.  I grew up “different” too (being blind), so I can identify with Freddie.  I know what it feels like to want to fit in.  Never in a million years though would I have expected THAT kind of bullying.  That second-grader and teenager were terrorizing my children!

If it were just words, I would have told them, “Stick and stones…”, but the threats and the shooting at my kid’s HEAD?

After the police officer left to talk with the other kids who were involved, I couldn’t help but wonder to myself, “Am I over-reacting? I’m I being over-protective? Should I have handled this differently?” See, I’m not trying to raise tea cups that should be placed on a shelf and protect from all harm.  But by the same token, shooting at my kids and my animals, terrifying my kids (who were trying to protect the animals from the pellets) goes WAY over the line.  I NEVER experienced bullying like that when I was a kid.

My kids were so scared.  Our cat and our chickens are well loved, and my kids were doing their best to protect them.  I can’t help but judge the way those boys are being parented because NEVER should it cross a kid’s mind to shoot at other kids or animals that weren’t doing anything other than existing (on MY property, I might add.)

My kids were also shocked by the language that the boys were using.  My daughter told me, “Mom, they were cussing like sailors! A second grader that was using the s-word, the d-word, and even the F-WORD!” And unfortunately that’s a trend that I’ve noticed that I just don’t get.  We NEVER talked like that in grade school or even junior high.  I learned to curse from an expert, and I’m pretty sure I didn’t even know about the f-word until I was maybe in the 4th grade.  Even then, I wouldn’t have dreamed of saying it, nor did ANYONE in my age group.

I was prepared to deal with bullying, but I never would have guessed that it’d take that kind of turn in my own front yard.  Last night’s experience was definitely an eye-opener for us, and it has me rethinking some of my parenting strategies for sure.

Posted in Blogs, Family & Faith Matters | Tagged | Comments Off

Low-Carb “Breaded” Chicken Tenders

chicken tender on a plateAfter purchasing a small deep fryer at Aldi, we “invented” breading for chicken that worked shockingly well.  I even breaded some bone-in chicken thighs and I was shocked by our success, especially because I’ve never enjoyed fried chicken.  I hope everyone enjoys this gluten-free, low-carb alternative to breaded chicken tenders as much as we did.

Ingredients

  • 3 eggs, lightly beaten
  • 1/2 c coconut flour
  • 1/2 c grated Parmesan cheese
  • 1 T poultry seasoning
  • 2 t garlic powder
  • 1/4 t dried Italian seasoning
  • 2 t sea salt
  • 1/4 t cayenne pepper
  • oil for frying (We used coconut.)
  • chicken (We used boneless chicken tenders and bone-in, skin-on thighs.)

Procedure

  1. Heat oil to 350 degrees Fahrenheit.
  2. Place beaten eggs in a shallow bowl or dish.  In a second shallow bowl or small dish, combine coconut flour, Parmesan cheese, and seasonings.  Blend well.
  3. Use your left hand to place chicken, one or two pieces at a time, into the egg wash.  Coat all sides with egg, and then use your left hand (“wet” hand) to place chicken in “breading”.
  4. Use your right hand (“dry” hand) to coat the chicken pieces in “breading”, and then use your “dry hand” to place chicken on a plate to rest.
  5. Fry chicken pieces in the heated oil for approximately 7 minutes (or until done).

Note: We marinated our chicken in Frank’s Red Hot Sauce before we breaded it.  It gave the chicken some added flavor that it really needed.  I’d bet you could marinate the chicken in ranch dressing or buttermilk before breading as well, and I’m sure you’d get a tasty result.

 

 

Posted in Recipes | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Kraft Mac & Cheese Attacked for Right Reasons?

How many of us grew up eating Kraft Macaroni and Cheese? I know I did.  In fact, I continued to eat it into adulthood, and I’ve been known to feed it to my kids from time to time.  Fortunately, avoiding wheat takes foods like mac and cheese off the menu, but according to many, there’s something much more concerning about products like Kraft Mac & Cheese that contain artificial colors.

Back in the 1980s, I remember the big deal with red M&Ms.  Then, in the 1990s, I started hearing about people who were “allergic” to Red No. 40.  Finally, in the last decade, I started to hear about folks who claimed Red No. 40 made ADHD symptoms worse and caused migraines.  I even have a friend who’s sensitive to Yellow No. 5.  Never in all that time though did I know that these dyes (and others) were banned in Europe.  Until I heard Mira and Dr. Jayson Calton on one of Jimmy Moore’s podcasts, I had no idea that these substances were problematic.  I mean, of COURSE I advocate eating real food, but my thought process went something like, “They’re just dyes.  They can’t be that big a deal.”

So after being educated by the Caltons’ work (among others), it didn’t surprise me one bit that folks were going after Kraft Mac & Cheese.  It’s not like Kraft is worse than other manufacturers, but they’re huge which makes them an easy target.

Honestly, I don’t get it.  Is it really that important for Americans to have yellower cheese? The European product without the controversial dyes tastes just as good.  Do Americans deserve a little hyperactivity and cancer with their cheese?

When doing some reading for this blog post, I learned about the degrees to which these dyes have invaded our food supply.  For instance, do you know that there’s a dye used to make orange peels more orange? So a person might use some orange zest in a recipe and end up eating a dye that isn’t cleared for consumption.  Food scientists at these big companies are doing everything they can to give their products an upper leg, and in the process, it’s making us sick and fat!

I’m not claiming that we should declare an all-out war on Kraft specifically.  They’re not the only company that does this sort of thing.  We as consumers need to be more educated though, and I don’t know if anyone’s noticed, but it’s not always that easy these days.

Related Links

Posted in Blogs, Natural Living | Tagged , | Comments Off

Recipe Review: Pumpkin Pancakes from Civilized Caveman Cooking Creations

Last week, I was catching up on podcasts, and I happened to catch an episode of The Livin’ La Vida Low-Carb Show with Jimmy Moore that featured George Bryant, the “Civilized Caveman”.  George spent a lot of time talking about amazing-sounding food, so after finishing the podcast, I headed on over to his site to check him out.  Boy, did I ever find a gem!

George’s site is full of recipes that look quick, simple, and tasty.  Over at civilizedcavemancooking.com, you can find everything from breakfast to main dishes to dessert.  It’s all Paleo, and even though it’s not all low-carb, it looks like most of the recipes can be slightly modified to fit in with your nutritional goals.

While scanning George’s site the other day for something new to try, his pumpkin pancakes recipe caught my eye.  I finally tried it this morning and I found the recipe to be surprisingly good.  In the past, I haven’t been completely satisfied with coconut flour as the only “flour” in a recipe, so I was a bit dubious, but boy did these pancakes turn out well.

I did modify George’s recipe slightly.  Instead of 6 tablespoons of coconut milk, I used 8 tablespoons of heavy cream (to get the fat content up even more), and I sweetened the batter with stevia instead of honey.  I put my snack plates on my George Foreman grill, I set the temp at 350 degrees (Fahrenheit), and cooked each batch for 4 minutes.  They came out great, and I wouldn’t change a thing!

The recipe made 12 pancakes.  I ate two with butter, and that was plenty filling for me.  I’ll see if they reheat well, but that’s assuming they don’t get wiped out by the kids before they make it to the fridge.

Related Links

Posted in Blogs, Recipes | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off

FDA Hears Comment on Dairy Groups’ Petition to Redefine Milk

When I buy dairy products like milk, sour cream, yogurt, heavy whipping cream, and half and half, I expect to get relatively pure ingredients.  And if my dairy products contain other ingredients, I expect to see those ingredients listed on the label.  That way, I can make an informed decision regarding the purchase of that particular item.  If two dairy groups get their way though, “milk” may not mean milk anymore.

In short, two groups have petitioned the FDA to change the definition of milk (and 17 other dairy products).  They want to add “safe and suitable” sweeteners to these dairy products, and they don’t want to tell you that they’ve done it.  This means that when you buy a container of “plain” yogurt, you could be getting sweeteners that the manufacturer doesn’t have to tell you about.

These groups claim that the changes will help fight childhood obesity by allowing the addition of non-nutritive sweeteners to flavored milk, but I don’t buy it.  First, I don’t think that kids should have flavored milk in school to begin with, but even putting that aside, how would changing the standard of identity for sour cream or yogurt or half and half help?

In some ways, it reminds me of the swill dairies from the 1800s.  The cows’ milk was blue, so they’d add chalk to make it white and they’d mix in other ingredients to hide the bad taste.  I don’t need sweetener in my cream or sour cream, and if I want some, I’ll add it myself!

It’s getting harder and harder to find pure, real foods these days.  More and more companies want to hide ingredients and processes from the consumer, and I hope that it’s a practice that Americans won’t abide.

Rest assured, I’ll be commenting during the comment period.  I don’t know if it’ll make any difference, but I’ll certainly make my opinion known.  When I read “milk” on a label, I expect that it means “milk” and not “milk plus some non-nutritive sweetener because the milk wasn’t sweet enough because we took out some of the fat or added some other nastiness to the product”.  It certainly has me thinking more about dairy animals at the homestead.

Related Links

Posted in Blogs, Natural Living | Tagged , | Comments Off

Liberty Alert: Companies Make Small Gains in Fight Against HHS Birth Control Mandate

I had hoped to get this post out on Ash Wednesday.  I thought the timing would have been appropriate.  Since it didn’t work out that way though, I thought, “Better late than never!”

On Tuesday, Grote Industries, a vehicle lighting manufacturer based in Madison, Indiana, won an injunction that, for now, protects the owners’ religious freedom as it pertains to the HHS birth control mandate.  Had the company not received the injunction, they would have been fined for every day that they didn’t offer health coverage that paid for birth control, sterilization, and abortion drugs.

The preliminary injunction was granted in a 2 to 1 vote in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.  Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner dissented.  From the National Catholic Register:

“Rovner argued that corporations, not their owners, are obliged to provide contraceptive coverage by the mandate. She said that because Grote Industries is not ‘organized expressly to pursue religious ends’,it has no ‘religious interests or rights.’”

I’m absolutely thrilled to see that some courts are respecting the religious rights of for-profit business owners.  I was horrified though by the supposition that to do business in the United States, to earn a fair wage for a full day’s work, you have to throw religious principals straight out the window.  Again, the federal government is asking people to choose.  Do business in the U.S. or be Catholic Christians.  How can people be expected to choose?

There are a number of for-profit businesses that are challenging the HHS mandate on religious grounds.  It’ll be interesting to see how everything unfolds.  Not all plantiffs are getting injunctions, but more are successful than not.  The thought of doing any sort of business in a way that’s counter to my moral conscience formation terrifies me, so bet I’ll be watching and praying.

Related Links

Posted in Blogs, Family & Faith Matters, Liberty & Freedom | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Proposal to Protect Right to Hunt, Fish, Farm Gets IN Senate Approval

Indiana flagOn February 11, 2013, in a 38 to 10 vote, the Indiana Senate approved a proposal that would protect Hoosiers’ rights to hunt, fish, and farm under the state Constitution.  If the measure wins favor in the House, we would vote on the constitutional amendment in the 2014 general election.

When I first heard about the proposal, I thought, “Well, that sounds like a good idea.” Then I started to do some research.  Some folks suspect that it’s a ploy by those running CAFOs and huge monocrop operations to do as they please.  Some think it’s built-in protection for hunters and fisherman from animal rights activists.

Since I can’t find the text of the proposal anywhere, I don’t have a way to make an informed decision one way or the other yet.  I can say though, given what’s happened in states like Wisconsin (where courts have said flat-out that their citizens don’t have fundamental rights to produce and consume their food), it’s probably a good idea to have some constitutional protection when it comes to our rights with respect to food.

Some argue that we don’t need a constitutional amendment because we already have laws protecting our right to farm, hunt, and fish.  Here’s the thing though.  You’d think that the government would never infringe an individual’s right to something as basic as the right to produce, obtain, or consume food, but it’s been done many times over.  By defining rights in a constitutional amendment, it seems that the legislature is attempting to “see around corners”, heading off problems before they become evident.

I do understand the concern of those who think it’s a ploy by Big Ag to gain more power and less regulation.  Again though, without seeing the text of what the Senate approved, I can’t judge for myself.  It sounds plausible, but it also makes for a highly inflammatory news article or blog post.  I’m always trying to protect my home and food from Big Ag’s reach, but I don’t know if that’s a valid concern yet.

It’ll be interesting to see where things go when the measure comes up for approval in the House.  Rest assured, I’ll be keeping a close eye on this one!

Related Links

Posted in Blogs, Liberty & Freedom | Tagged , | Comments Off

Grain and Gut Bacteria: More to the Story?

smiling bacteria cartoonMy husband knows that I love to “geek out” on the science behind the topics pertinent to me and my family, so he sent me a real gem from Slashdot.  I’m guessing he thought I’d be particularly interested since the title contained “gut bacteria”, “toxins”, and “grain” in the same sentence.  As usual, he was right.

If you’ve read Dr. William Davis’s book, Wheat Belly, or Robb Wolf’s book, The Paleo Solution, you understand the issues that come with grain — but especially wheat — in the human diet.  Grains weren’t meant to be digested by mammals.  And although I understood some of the mechanisms that make grains problematic, this research shows yet another compelling reason to avoid grains.

I know, I know.  Many folks out there will say, “Humans have been eating grains for 10,000 years.” To them I say, “I can eat a cupcake wrapper that might taste good going down, but paper certainly isn’t good for me.”

For just one second, let’s ignore the debate about whether or not grains should be a part of the human diet.  Let’s ignore modern GMO crops that are sprayed with enough toxins to kill us hundreds of times over.  You all know where I stand on those issues.  For now, let’s limit our consideration to nothing more than the issue of mycotoxins and human gut microbes.  The implications are frightening!

For some background, plants like wheat, corn, and peanuts (a legume), are frequently contaminated by mold.  These molds produce toxins that are harmful to the plant, so the plant “hides” these dangerous substances with sugar (or sometimes a sulfate group).

This process of hiding toxins protects the plant, but the new research seems to indicate that humans are vulnerable.  Apparently, when a human eats one of these plants, gut microbes feed on the sugars that were masking the mycotoxins.  In doing that, they free those toxins in the digestive tract.  Now, I suppose this wouldn’t be much of a concern if our digestive tract were like a garden hose.  The problem is though, it’s not.  There are entirely too many mechanisms that would allow these toxins to enter our bloodstream, and for me, that explains a lot.

Think, for example, about kids whose autism symptoms are lessened by eliminating grains and legumes.  If folks are seeing good results “going Paleo”, then I can’t help but think it has something to do with these toxins which have known gastrointestinal and neurological side effects.  When you combine that with the fact that folks with autism tend to have compromised GI tracts AND particular sensitivity to toxins, a strong case can be made for the elimination of those foods.

These new findings also have me thinking about folks who suffer from candida.  Most definitely, candida suffers have “leaky gut” which gives toxins direct access to the bloodstream.  Combine that with the overgrowth of certain microbes in the gut flora, and you have a situation that can make someone really sick in no time flat.

I understand why folks in the U.S. are unwilling to face the reality that grain isn’t good for us.  Turning folks away from wheat and corn-based products poses a huge threat to Big Ag and Factory Food.  It’s almost impossible to find a processed food or supplement that doesn’t contain corn in some form.  And as I think about it, it’s no wonder that corn syrup is so bad for us.  Not only does the fructose appear to be an issue, but by isolating corn sugar, I can’t help but wonder if you may as well give someone a mycotoxin IV.

And lastly, I can’t help but wonder if these toxins themselves have a negative impact on our gut flora.  Not only do we encourage gut dysbiosis by eating too much sugar, too many chemicals, and not enough probiotic foods, but these mycotoxins might be directly weakening this crucial part of our immune system.

I don’t know that the mainstream is ready to face these implications yet, but it certainly sheds a new light on things for those of us who’re trying to heal ourselves and our families.  It’s just another piece of the puzzle that we have to consider, and it’s definitely not worth overlooking.

Related Links

Posted in Blogs | Tagged , , | Comments Off

At the Wittekind Homestead: Update for 02/05/13

It’s been awhile since I’ve posted a homestead update, and even though we’ve been dealing with the gloom of winter in Indiana, there’s plenty to do!

Despite the fact that we’re a quarter of the way into year four at the homestead, we’re still discovering the “character” that comes with our house.  January gifted us with an extremely expensive electrical repair, and it also appears that our phone line requires immediate attention.  Thankfully, repairing the phone line requires nothing more than a new phone jack, some wire, and a trip into the crawl space.  I’ll take that any day compared to the $1000 electrician’s bill that we acquired earlier this month.

On a more exciting note though, some friends came over on Sunday.  I made an amazing pot of venison stew, and we started something like 300 seeds for our two gardens.  I have the space to start seedlings at my house, so in exchange for the use of my space, they provided the seeds.  Most of them came from Stephen Scott over at Terroir Seeds, and I can’t wait to see how things go there.  We started two kinds of broccoli, cauliflower, three kinds of cabbage, Brussels sprouts, two or three kinds of spinach, and a couple of varieties of lettuce along with some peas.  We likely started more seeds than we can handle, but if that’s the case, that’s a good problem to have, I guess.

The same friends that are partnering with gardening efforts had hoped to help us add to our backyard chicken flock.  My husband had seen a shed for sale that would have made a nice chicken shed, and the price couldn’t be beat.  When we went to investigate though, the shed had been sold.  Given our current financial situation, we’re not in any position to spend hundreds (or even thousands) on a shed, so we may not get to add to the flock this year.  It all depends on what our friends want to do, and it depends on what kinds of opportunities present themselves to us.  It’s still too early to know.

Things are still a bit sluggish here.  I think my husband is mostly recovered from influenza, but unfortunately, he’s responsibilities didn’t end just because he had a doctor’s note telling him to stay home.  It’s bound to be busy, so we’re trying to do all that we can to support each other and make this work.  Personally, I’m excited about starting the seeds though.  It makes me feel like spring isn’t too far away after all.

What are the rest of you doing to close out the winter chores (or start the spring chores) where you live? How is 2013 going to be different? Have any of you taken up the 13 in ’13 challenge over at 13Skills.com? I can’t wait to hear about the great things that are coming for all of us this year.  Just remember that what we do matters! And as always, staying positive helps.

Posted in Blogs, Homesteading, Natural Living, Prepping | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Low-Carb IS Expensive — Until It’s Not!

How many of us in the low-carb world have heard, “I can’t eat that way.  It’s too expensive!”? And how many of us have argued that it’s not expensive if you choose the right foods and plan carefully? I know I’ve made those arguments.  Last week though, a dear friend and I were talking, and it occurred to me.  Low-carb eating IS expensive — until it’s not.

No, I’m not trying to be witty.  And actually, the “answer” wouldn’t have occurred to me had I not been struggling myself right now.  And like I told my friend, it all boils down to being fat-adapted AND having seen results that keep you pushing through the tough times.

See, I think a lot of long-time low-carbers forget about what it’s like to start out.  In the beginning, you’re trying to establish new habits AND you’re trying to detox from the carbs.  The transition to “fat burner” from “sugar burner” isn’t easy, and that alone can sink you.

So how does that affect the cost of your food? Well, it’s like this.  When you first start on a low-carb eating plan, it’s wise to surround yourself with healthy choices.  But since you’re not yet fat-adapted, it can take a higher volume of food to get things moving, and those foods cost more.  For instance, I could buy 96 ounces of ice cream for less than the price of a 12 ounce ribeye.  Now I’m not saying that you have to live off ribeyes, but junk calories ARE cheaper than real foods — at first.

I would definitely agree that a well-formulated low-carb, high-fat diet is cheaper once you’re 1) fat adapted and 2) practiced with food prep and meal planning.  Let me illustrate.

While in nutritional ketosis, I would have a meal of scrambled eggs with veggies and cream.  Then, in the evening, I’d eat something like a chicken thigh.  That food met my nutritional requirements, I wasn’t hungry, and it cost me about $2.76.  On a carb binge day though, I could easily eat 48 ounces of ice cream, a package of flour tortillas, a can of refried beans, and some butter and brown sugar and cinnamon for tortillas that weren’t used for bean burritos.  That’d cost close to $6.

So at that point, clearly, low-carb is cheaper.  I need less food, and I’m not feeding an ever-present carb beast.  In the beginning though, before I’m fat adapted, my food needs might look more like this.  Bacon and eggs for breakfast, a burger and tossed salad for lunch, a snack of cheese and pepperoni, steak, steamed veg, and more salad for supper, and “cheesecake” for dessert or another snack.  That day’s worth of food could cost upwards of $8, and when you’re worried about your food budget, the thought of spending that much money in the beginning can be off-putting.

Now, as a veteran in the low-carb world, when I find myself off track, I worry about the cost from a different perspective.  See, I know that in the end, not only is my daily food cheaper, but medical expenses and clothing costs are lessened too.  The problem is, if you find yourself getting back on track in the midst of financial uncertainty, it’s natural to worry about continuing to stay on track long enough to get into ketosis.  That’s what I’m struggling with right now.

Getting through the initial carb detox is the hardest part, and that DOES take more money.  Once you’re in ketosis though, once you’re eating much less and once your results are showing you that you can’t go back, it’s easy to spend less money on a daily basis.

I guess what makes low-carb hard in lean times is the fact that food banks and friends will share foods that are useless to a low-carber.  And to be honest, I haven’t completely figured out a good work-around there.  It’s easy to say, “Give that food to family members that aren’t low-carbing and keep your head down,”, but when you have issues with food like I do, that can be particularly tough.  After all, if you’re an alcoholic, you don’t need alcohol to live.  But it’s not like you can just quit eating if you have an unhealthy addiction to food.  It’s a little more complicated than that.

All the usual rules still apply for low-carb on the cheap, but I do think it’s worth acknowledging that it CAN be more expensive in the beginning, but it doesn’t have to be that way forever.

Posted in Blogs, Low-Carb & Paleo | 2 Comments